You, the Animal - You, the Human Being
Which Has Higher Values?
How do you, the human, feel toward the life forms of nature?
Man transmitted his unlawful behavior to the animals
People are not always the understanding, helpful big brother or the understanding, helpful big sister. Unknowing people have their effect just as they are, that is, unknowing, on minerals, stones, plants and animals. For this reason, the material bodies of the animals and plants correspond to the particular state of development of the life form only to the point where they have not been changed by having been crossed with other life forms.
In the animal and plant worlds, it is like the soul, which is enveloped
by a coarse-material shell, the human body. What the soul bears, light or
shadow, it radiates, and with this it shapes its physical body. The physical
eyes can perceive solely the density, that is, matter. Matter is the
envelopment of the spirit, and is therefore relative.
Because man has interfered and is still interfering in the course of life on
Earth and of its life forms according to his own ideas, and has therefore
changed and is still changing many things, I would like to address my human
brothers and sisters with a revelation for which I have chosen the subject:
“You, the Animal—You, the Human. Who Has Higher Values?”
Before I can address this issue directly, I ask a serious question of all
human brothers and sisters who read my revelation, and with which I want to
stimulate an examination into the given facts:
How do humans live on this Earth?
How do many people act toward animals, the second neighbors, toward plants
and the mineral world?
Are humans with and for the animal world and for nature and the mineral
kingdoms—or are they against them?
Are you, dear brother, dear sister, one with all the substances of the Earth
and with all forms of life?
Do you—do many of your fellowmen—have access to the animal, plant and
mineral worlds?
Dear sister, dear brother, these questions surely have stimulated your
conscience. If they have also awakened your interest for the subject “You,
the Animal—You, the Human,” then know that my word of revelation refers
largely to the animal world; but I will also go into the world of minerals
and plants, since they are also life out of the omnipotent life.
Dear reader, think about these questions. Do not say straightaway that you
have access to all life forms. Examine yourself!
Do you believe—and in the broader sense, the many people on Earth—that it is in accordance with community life and love for animals, the second neighbors, the animal brothers and sisters, when in apartments and houses animals are kept in cages or, for example, a single cat or a single dog is kept in an apartment or a house? Is this love for animals, when you put your second neighbors, for example, dogs, on chains and give them only little free space to live in or when you keep cats exclusively in your apartments?
Some of you will say: “There is no other way, because there are dogs that need to be chained; otherwise they would attack people!” Again I ask you a direct question: From whom did the animals adopt this characteristic of attacking people?
Do you believe that the spiritual life forms—on Earth called collective-
or part-souls—which, as second neighbors, are enveloped in a coarse-material
body, have brought these aggressions with them from the heavens? Or has man,
over the course of millennia, transmitted this to the animal world through
his human, aggressive behavior toward his fellow men and toward the animals?
This influence toward the negative does not show its effect in one single
incarnation. This process takes place over the course of many incarnations,
for animals that live in a combine of collective souls—including animals
with part-souls—also incarnate again and again, until they are called back
into the spiritual developmental planes by the Creator-God, the Spirit of
evolution.
The innocent animal is chained up because either in previous incarnations
or in this present one people have, for instance, hunted and pursued it and
maybe even trained it to bite and kill. If for this reason, the animal is
not well-disposed toward a person and attacks him, then the person says that
it is a wild, fierce beast that needs to be chained up!
I ask another direct question to my human brothers and sisters:
Who is it that would need to be bridled? Shouldn’t those people rather
bridle themselves or feel the chain who have trained and train their second
neighbors to acts of violence or who have acted and act violently against
them, thus depriving them of their liberty and freedom of movement?
So-called “dangerous” dogs are put on the leash as a matter of course, so that people are protected from them. But who forced these negative characteristics on the second neighbors so that they became dangerous?
It was and is the people who were and are unkind, hard-hearted and intolerant toward their fellow men, who belittle their fellow men in order to aggrandize themselves, or who berated and berate their neighbors, who made and make them dependent and who brought and bring them up to be yes-men, who trained and train them, so to speak, for their purposes.
People who are not free are trained people, who do as their neighbor wants. By doing so, they have tied their will to the will of the one who oppressed them and trained them to be a yes-man. The one who causes his neighbor to become will-less, contributes to the fact that annoyance, frustration and aggression build up inside the latter. In many cases, it is the animals, the second neighbors, which have to endure their outbursts.
And so, the danger comes from the human being. He transferred and transfers his dangerousness to the animal. To be fair, the brutal, aggressive, dangerous human ought to be chained or put on a leash so that he come to his senses. In many cases this would be more helpful and salutary, because through this he would be stimulated to change his way of thinking, before the causes he has set break in over him as effects.
One argument used by many people is the following: “We have to protect our second neighbors from the dangers, for example, of fast vehicles, of the clutches of people or of their own unpredictability.” Therefore, dogs, for example, have to walk on a leash for several hours, particularly in the cities of this world. Do not say: “Because we love animals, we do it this way. We want to protect them.” Is it love to keep, to bring up and train God’s creatures according to your criteria and as you see fit?
Is it love to race along your roads in fast vehicles, so that countless creatures of the air are smashed against your cars, against your so-called windshields, or that they are run over and have to thus suffer unimaginably?
Through the negative behavior of people, through the chain, the leash, the cage and through the fact that the second neighbor has to live among people as single animals, many animals became prisoners of those people who have acquired them for selfish reasons and therefore use them accordingly. Many animals are with people only because they are forced into this by them.
Another wrongdoing of people is genetic alterations, the alteration of
the predispositions of animals through crossbreeding. Many animal bodies
have been crossbred by people so often—thus influencing the genes—that they
are unable to live out the natural predispositions acquired from creation,
with the result that they hardly have a conscious communication anymore with
the Creator-God, the Spirit of evolution. When the part-souls are then
called by their Creator, they hardly perceive Him, because they have been
deformed, tortured and wantonly killed by many people, or because they ended
up in the hands of slaughterers who prepared them for consumption or abused
them in experiments.
Humans interfere in the course of procreation by taking the female animal to
the male animal and vice versa. And so, humans thus decide if and when the
female animal conceives and from which male second neighbor this should
happen and in what year.
Whether the species and the predispositions harmonize or not, whether the genes match for the most part, whether the vibration of the blood and the frequency of the bodies fit together, is likewise not taken into account. Whether the law of nature has other intentions with the male as well as with the female second neighbor—despotic man does not ask about that. The animal is to do what the tyrant desires. If an animal then attacks the despotic person, who once forced it in many ways to do something that was not meant for this animal in the course of the law of nature, then the second neighbor is beaten and tortured because of its improper behavior. In reality, the person received only what he had sown, that is, caused.
For many people, everything that seems to not speak or defend itself is a
lifeless, in many cases, a nameless, thing, a commodity, which can be used
at human discretion—that is, mistreated.
Dear brothers and sisters in the earthly garment, is this love for the
animal world?
Spirit beings and nature beings are untiringly active to protect the collective and part-souls of the animals, in order to maintain the spiritual communication—as far as this is possible—so that they can perceive the call of the All-One when He wants to guide them back into the spiritual development planes.
© by Publishing House DAS WORT GmbH
Max-Braun-Str. 4, 97828 Marktheidenfeld, Germany
All rights of distribution and reproduction of excerpts are reserved.
You may also
order this book online there. (Order No. S133en)
Back to Table of Content | Literature